About Course
Print: Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment http://www.psychiatryonline.com/popup.aspx?aID=238762&print=yes…
1 of 11
31/01/2009 06:55
Print Close Window
DOI: 10.1176/appi.books.9781585622825.238759
Manual of Clinical Psychopharmacology >
Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment
INTRODUCTION
Psychiatrists see patients in crisis not only in emergency rooms (ERs) but also (occasionally) in
their offices, during home visits, or in medical or nursing home settings. In this chapter, we
address some of the more common emergencies facing the clinical psychiatrist.
In emergency situations, psychiatrists are often faced with the diagnosis and treatment of patients
presenting with psychiatric symptoms of sudden or presumed recent onset. Phenomenologically,
these symptoms can be crudely subdivided into the following types:
- Agitation and violent behavior, with or without signs of alcohol or other intoxication
- Depression with suicidal ideation, with or without a recent suicide attempt
Acute psychotic reactions, usually with overt thought disorder, paranoid ideation, and/or hallucinations
and marked fear or anger
- Delirium presenting with disorientation and confusion, with or without psychotic symptoms
- Severe anxiety without psychotic symptoms but often with physical symptoms
- Psychogenic stupor/catatonia
In some of these situations a history can be obtained either from the patient or from friends or
relatives. Sometimes the patient may be carrying enough identification that friends or relatives can
be rapidly contacted. In the worst situation, the psychiatrist will have little to go on besides the
patient’s behavior and a brief physical examination. When the patient is severely disturbed,
obtunded, or confused, can give no history, and has no diagnostic stigmata (e.g., needle tracks,
obvious atropine-like toxic signs), hospitalization without specific drug treatment, or at least
medical evaluation with toxic screens, electrocardiogram, and so forth in a competent medical
emergency facility, is indicated.
We stress the importance of trying to ascertain which drugs the patient has been taking or may
have been taking before pharmacotherapy is begun. Deaths have occurred when a tricyclic
antidepressant (TCA) or meperidine was given to patients who were already taking monoamine
oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). Adding sedative drugs in a patient already intoxicated on alcohol or
other sedative drugs is unwise. Adding a neuroleptic in a patient with possible neuroleptic
malignant syndrome (NMS) is obviously contraindicated. Similarly, drugs must be carefully chosen
if a TCA overdose may have affected cardiac function. In short, when the patient may have been
taking preexisting medication or may have overdosed on an unknown drug, it is better to avoid
medication until the situation can be clarified.
AGITATION AND VIOLENCE
Few ER encounters are more difficult than having to contend with an agitated, violent patient.
Individuals representing many diagnostic groups may present to the ER in an agitated, violent
state. In one survey, 80% of teaching hospital ERs reported patient assaults of staff members, and
at least 25% of these ERs had to restrain patients daily (Lavoie et al. 1988). Violence often
represents an attempt by the patient to assert control in the context of feeling frightened and
helpless.
In nonpsychotic patients presenting in ERs with angry tantrums, as well as in similar patients with
severe anxiety that seems to be based on family fights or other interpersonal crises, supportive
listening, reassurance, and the elixir of time often enable the patient to gradually become calm and
reasonable without specific medication. Sedative- or alcohol-related angry intoxication also often
passes gradually with time, talk, and external limit setting.Print: Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment http://www.psychiatryonline.com/popup.aspx?aID=238762&print=yes…
2 of 11
31/01/2009 06:55
From the legal perspective, the use of external restraints is generally considered a less invasive
intervention than the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications. No intervention is
more effective for potentially violent patients than a sufficient show of force to restrain the patient,
if necessary, along with calm reassurance. Thus, this option should be employed if the patient
represents an imminent danger to himself or herself or others. However, some patients are quite
capable of exhausting or injuring themselves while in restraints. In these cases the addition of
medications is frequently required.
A number of open-label studies have investigated the use of various psychotropic agents in the
“rapid tranquilization” of agitated patients. Dr. William Dubin of Temple University has used that
term to describe the use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines given every half hour or hour to
treat the target symptoms of agitation, motor excitement, tension, and hostility. Rapid
tranquilization is sometimes confused with rapid neuroleptization, which uses large loading doses
of antipsychotics, sometimes as much as 100 mg/day of haloperidol, in an attempt to accelerate
remission of psychotic symptoms. Unfortunately, studies have revealed that this strategy is not
successful, and side effects are burdensome. Rapid tranquilization strategies have been studied
with both psychotic and nonpsychotic patients.
The typical rapid tranquilization approach employs an intramuscular route of administration for
rapid absorption and increased bioavailability (Table 10–1). However, Dubin et al. (1985)
suggested that oral concentrate forms of antipsychotics also provide rapid response and may
decrease feelings of helplessness in an already vulnerable patient, relative to being approached
with a needle. In a study of 159 agitated psychiatric patients randomized to either intramuscular or
oral concentrate forms of thiothixene, haloperidol, or thioridazine, there was a minimal time
advantage to using the intramuscular route of administration, but fewer intramuscular doses were
required to achieve a satisfactory response (Dubin et al. 1985). In medical-surgical patients, the
intravenous route of administration is also a common option. Moller et al. (1982) found that
patients given intravenous haloperidol improved more rapidly than patients taking oral haloperidol
in the first 3 hours. However, after 3 hours there was no significant difference between the oral
and the intravenous haloperidol–treated groups. Several other open-label studies have confirmed
the utility of intravenous haloperidol and benzodiazepines (lorazepam) in the management of
agitated medical-surgical patients.
Table 10–1. Medication options for rapid tranquilization of agitated patients (administered every
30–60 minutes)
Medication
Dose
Average total dose for tranquilization
Intramuscular Oral
haloperidol 2.5–5 mg 5–10 mg 10–20 mg
thiothixene 10–20 mg 5–10 mg 15–30 mg
droperidol 2.5–5 mg Not available 5–20 mg
loxapine 10–15 mg 25 mg 30–60 mg
chlorpromazine 50 mg 100 mg 300–600 mg
lorazepam 0.5–1 mg 1–2 mg 4–8 mg
diazepam Not applicable 5–10 mg 20–60 mg
olanzapine 2.5–10 mg 2.5–5 mg 10–20 mg
ziprasidone 10–20 mg 40–160 mg 10–20 mg
aripiprazole 9.75 mg 10–30 mg 9.75–19.5 mg
Intramuscular atypicals such as intramuscular olanzapine, aripiprazole, and ziprasidone may well
replace intramuscular typicals such as haloperidol. However, if they do so, it will not likely be
because of superior efficacy. Rather the advantage of intramuscular atypicals may be in reducedPrint: Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment http://www.psychiatryonline.com/popup.aspx?aID=238762&print=yes…
3 of 11
31/01/2009 06:55
acute extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). On the other hand, a significant disadvantage of the
atypical intramuscular formulations is that they are substantially more costly than generic agents
such as haloperidol. Intramuscular olanzapine has now been approved for use in treating agitation
associated with psychosis. It has been studied in the acute management of schizophrenia,
dementia, and bipolar disorder. In acutely agitated patients with dementia, olanzapine at 2.5 or 5
mg im was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing agitation 2 and 24 hours
postinjection (lorazepam at 1 mg was not) (Meehan et al. 2002). In patients with schizophrenia,
olanzapine at 5–10 mg im was significantly more effective than placebo at 2 and 24 hours
postinjection (Breier et al. 2001); similar data at 10–25 mg were observed in acutely manic
patients (Meehan et al. 2001). The primary advantages of intramuscular olanzapine over
intramuscular haloperidol are a faster onset of action and less EPS (Wright et al. 2003). The onset
of action of intramuscular olanzapine is within 30 minutes, and minimal EPS have been reported.
The most common side effects were somnolence and dizziness. Occasional mild hypotension and
bradycardia have been reported.
An injectable form of ziprasidone has been available since 2002. Ziprasidone has been evaluated in
several double-blind trials in the treatment of acute agitation. Both 10 mg and 20 mg im appear to
be effective, but 2 mg im was not effective. Like olanzapine, intramuscular ziprasidone has a low
incidence of EPS. In studies of acute agitation in psychotic patients, dosages of 10–20 mg/day
were as effective as haloperidol in treating agitation and more effective in treating psychosis. The
most common side effects with intramuscular ziprasidone were headache, nausea, and somnolence.
Aripiprazole became the latest atypical antipsychotic to be indicated in the treatment of acute
agitation associated with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia. Several
studies of the acute effects of aripiprazole in the reduction of agitation have demonstrated the
superiority of this agent to placebo and its equivalence to intramuscular haloperidol (Andrezina et
- 2006a, 2006b). Intramuscular aripiprazole appears to produce EPS much less commonly than
does intramuscular haloperidol, with about 2% of aripiprazole-treated patients experiencing
akathisia and 1% experiencing dystonic reactions. It is likely, but untested, that repeated doses
may increase the risk of EPS. Other side effects more commonly seen with intramuscular
aripiprazole than with placebo include headache, somnolence, nausea, and dizziness.
For severely agitated or imminently violent patients, rapid tranquilization strategies employ
antipsychotics every 30–60 minutes until the target symptoms of hostility, agitation, and
assaultiveness are reduced. Most studies suggest that the typical dose of antipsychotics required is
in the range of 300–600 mg of chlorpromazine, 10–20 mg of haloperidol, or 10–20 mg of
olanzapine over a 2- to 4-hour period (see Table 10–1). The high-potency typical antipsychotics
have the advantage of not producing significant adrenergic blockade in the acute setting. However,
akathisia and dystonic reactions may be problematic at higher doses, particularly in young males.
We have found that alternating the antipsychotic with a benzodiazepine is also a sound strategy. In
a common regimen, haloperidol 5 mg im is alternated with lorazepam 1–2 mg im every 30 minutes
until tranquilization is achieved. Droperidol was sometimes used for rapid tranquilization but has
now received a black box warning secondary to QTc prolongation. Droperidol is also associated with
hypotension and respiratory depression. Thus, its use in psychiatric settings is rarely warranted.
Lorazepam is the only benzodiazepine reliably absorbed from all routes of administration. However,
for oral dosing, diazepam may offer the most rapid onset of action. The combination of
benzodiazepines and antipsychotics offers several advantages. Frequently, lower doses of both
classes of medications are sufficient when they are combined. The lower doses decrease the risks
of side effects from either the benzodiazepines or the antipsychotics. Further, benzodiazepines may
counter some neuroleptic side effects, including akathisia. Likewise, the combination with
high-potency neuroleptics may reduce the excessive sedation associated with use of
benzodiazepines alone. However, some data support the idea that benzodiazepines alone may be as
effective as antipsychotics within the first 24 hours, even with floridly psychotic patients (Saklad et
- 1985).Print: Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment http://www.psychiatryonline.com/popup.aspx?aID=238762&print=yes…
4 of 11
31/01/2009 06:55
For less severe acute agitation, especially in a nonpsychotic patient, the use of benzodiazepines
alone appears to be adequate. Lorazepam 1–2 mg po every hour to a maximum of 10 mg or
diazepam 5–10 mg every hour to a maximum of 60 mg is usually enough to calm the more
moderately agitated patient.
A number of long-term strategies for the management of aggression in patients have been used.
Mood-stabilizing agents such as lithium, carbamazepine, and valproate have proved useful in
controlling aggressive, violent impulses in some patients. The selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitors (SSRIs) have been used with some success in studies of treating patients with aggressive
personality disorders. Likewise, buspirone, propranolol, trazodone, and clozapine, with long-term
use, may all have a role in reducing aggression in some patients.
DEPRESSION AND SUICIDALITY
Depressed, suicidal patients, along with agitated patients, represent one of the most common and
serious challenges confronted by the ER clinician. In many ERs, complaints of depression and
suicidal ideation, with or without attempts, represent the most frequent reason for psychiatric
hospital admission. Predicting imminent suicide is sometimes not an easy matter, even for skilled
psychiatrists. Many factors have been known to increase the risk of suicide, including advanced
age, a diagnosis of major depression, male gender, concurrent alcohol use, a viable suicide plan,
and a history of serious suicide attempts. The significant majority of the successful 30,000 or so
suicides that occur in the United States annually involve white males older than 45. In addition,
depression or alcohol is implicated in approximately 75% of all suicides (Bongar 1992). Fawcett et
- (1990) attempted to further elucidate factors that may increase the immediate risk of suicide;
among these were global insomnia and severe anxiety (Table 10–2).
Table 10–2. Short-term (6- to 12-month) risk factors for suicide in depressed patients
Obsessive-compulsive features
Severe hopelessness
Panic, severe anxiety, and agitation
Global insomnia
Severe cognitive difficulties and psychotic thinking
Lack of friends in adolescence
Acute overuse of alcohol
Recurrent depression
Source. Adapted from Fawcett et al. 1990.
Suicidally depressed patients brought to an ER after suicide threats or nonharmful attempts present
a real challenge to clinical judgment. The conservative course is to admit such patients to a secure
inpatient unit. Occasionally, this may seem unwise or impractical. If the clinician can make a
relationship with and personally follow the patient, and if friends or relatives can reliably supervise
the patient until the next appointment, the patient may be referred for outpatient follow-up. In
general, any patient with suicidal ideation or attempt and depression who is psychotic, who cannot
attend to daily needs, who is acutely intoxicated, or about whose well-being the clinician has any
significant doubt should be admitted and observed.
Very few somatic interventions work rapidly enough to be useful in the emergency setting. For
example, it is generally unwise to start an antidepressant in the ER: the older antidepressants may
be lethal in overdose, the physician following the patient after the ER visit may not agree with the
ER’s choice of agents, and, in any case, it may take several weeks or longer for the antidepressant
to work. Thus, not much is lost in waiting to initiate antidepressant treatment until the patient is on
the ward or makes the first outpatient visit.
Given the type of imminent risk factors described by Fawcett et al. (1990), benzodiazepines arePrint: Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment http://www.psychiatryonline.com/popup.aspx?aID=238762&print=yes…
5 of 11
31/01/2009 06:55
probably underused in the emergency and acute setting for the treatment of suicidal patients.
Benzodiazepines may have an immediate effect on risk factors such as severe insomnia and
anxiety. Patients’ hopelessness is also attributed, in part, to the belief that they will never feel any
better. When they feel better quickly with a benzodiazepine, their belief system may be altered
enough to mitigate the risk of imminent suicide. We have found that lorazepam 0.5–1.0 mg qid,
with the last dose given at bedtime, can make a dramatic difference even in less agitated suicidal
patients.
A number of other somatic interventions are worth considering in the acute management of
imminently suicidal patients. Among these is electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). ECT may work very
rapidly in the profoundly depressed suicidal patient and may therefore be lifesaving. The average
number of ECT treatments for depression in the United States is eight to nine; therefore it is not
unusual to see significant benefit in the first 2 weeks of treatment. In addition, there is some
evidence that the rapid titration of some antidepressants may be associated with an earlier onset of
action. For example, premarketing studies (among them Montgomery 1993) suggested that
venlafaxine may have a more rapid onset of action when the dose is titrated up to 300 mg or more
in the first 7 days of treatment (Montgomery 1993). Unfortunately, we have found that many
patients are unable to tolerate this rapid dose titration. Other strategies that may be associated
with a more rapid onset of response for depressed suicidal patients include TCA augmentation of
SSRIs and lithium augmentation of various antidepressants.
Many depressed patients have used their antidepressants in suicide attempts. TCAs are the most
commonly used antidepressants in successful overdoses (Table 10–3). The usual cause of death in
these cases is malignant arrhythmias. Management of TCA overdoses includes charcoal lavage (50
g slurry followed by repeat doses of 25 g via nasogastric tube), admitting the patient to a unit for
cardiac monitoring, fluids to combat the adrenergic blockade, physostigmine 1 mg im for severe
anticholinergic symptoms, and correction of acidosis with sodium bicarbonate if necessary.
Table 10–3. Antidepressant overdoses and their management
Drug Toxic dose Toxicity manifestations Management
TCAs >1,500 mg
(imipramine and
most TCAs)
Anticholinergic symptoms,
arrhythmia, hypotension,
delirium, seizures
Gastric lavage, fluid support, cardiac
monitoring
MAOIs
2 mg/kg CNS excitation, hypo- or
hypertension, delirium, fever,
arrhythmia, seizures,
rhabdomyolysis
Gastric lavage, fluids, cardiac monitoring,
antihypertensives,body
cooling,benzodiazepines for CNS
symptoms, maintenance of MAOI diet
Bupropion >2 g CNS excitation, seizures Gastric lavage, benzodiazepines,
anticonvulsants
SSRIs Unknown CNS excitation, somnolence,
GI irritation
Gastric lavage, supportive care
SNRIs
(venlafaxine,
duloxetine)
Unknown Cardiotoxicity, hypertension,
seizures, serotonin effects
Gastric lavage, supportive care
Note. CNS = central nervous system; GI = gastrointestinal; MAOI = monoamine oxidase inhibitor; SNRI =
serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA = tricyclic
antidepressant.
MAOI overdoses of as little as 2 mg/kg may be lethal. The cause of death in MAOI overdoses
ranges from arrhythmia and cardiovascular collapse to rhabdomyolysis and renal failure. Acute
management of overdose includes gastric lavage, maintenance of MAOI diet, cardiac monitoring for
at least 24 hours, use of benzodiazepines to treat central nervous system activation, and use of
sodium nitroprusside or phentolamine 5 mg iv to treat the hypertension.Print: Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment http://www.psychiatryonline.com/popup.aspx?aID=238762&print=yes…
6 of 11
31/01/2009 06:55
MAOIs are also associated with another medical emergency: the development of a serotonin
syndrome. The combination of MAOIs with serotonergic drugs such as SSRIs and clomipramine (see
Chapter 3: “Antidepressants”) is among the more common causes of the serotonin syndrome.
Symptoms of the serotonin syndrome are tremor, diaphoresis, rigidity, myoclonus, and autonomic
dysregulation, potentially progressing to hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, coma, and death. The
treatment of serotonin syndrome involves discontinuing the offending drugs, monitoring vital signs,
and supporting vital functions. Cooling blankets are often helpful. Cyproheptadine, a general
serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) antagonist, has been used occasionally in oral doses up to
16 mg/day to counteract the serotonin syndrome. Dantrolene in doses up to 1 mg/kg iv in divided
doses has been used in severe cases to treat rigidity and prevent rhabdomyolysis. The key to
treatment of the serotonin syndrome, however, is discontinuing the offending agents and providing
supportive care.
Fortunately, many of the newer antidepressants present much less of a problem in overdose than
do the TCAs and MAOIs. Overdoses of SSRIs and 5-HT antagonists are often asymptomatic or may
present with gastrointestinal distress, agitation, and somnolence. The treatment of choice is gastric
lavage and supportive care. The British drug authorities warned that venlafaxine overdoses are
more likely to be lethal than are SSRI overdoses. Their data suggest that risk of lethality from
overdose with venlafaxine is comparable to that with TCAs. A review by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration resulted in a change in the package insert for venlafaxine in 2006 that indicates that
venlafaxine may carry a higher risk for a fatal outcome in overdose than SSRIs but less risk than
the TCAs. The risk of fatality in overdose is not just cardiac but also associated with seizures,
rhabdomyolysis, and other causes. Patients taking venlafaxine tend to be more ill than those taking
SSRIs, and this may be associated with a greater risk of overdoses in general (Rubino et al. 2006).
One possible mechanism for the increased risk is an effect on sodium channels. Bupropion
overdoses also tend to be less dangerous than overdoses of TCAs. There has, however, been at
least one death related to neurotoxicity and seizures (see Chapter 3: “Antidepressants”).
ACUTE PSYCHOTIC REACTIONS
Psychotic symptoms can be manifestations of drug usage, mania, depression, schizophrenia,
dementia, delirium, or a variety of other disorders. An organic basis for the psychosis should be
ruled out, whenever possible, by history, physical examination, and urine and/or blood tests for
drugs of abuse.
Mixed Psychotic Reactions
With any psychotic reaction presumptively due to toxicity from illicit or licit drugs, a variety of
complicated clinical pictures can occur. Illicit drug users often take several kinds of drugs and
alcohol simultaneously. Patients with schizophrenia abuse drugs and/or become intoxicated on
alcohol, and acute drug-induced psychosis can sometimes persist and blend into a picture
indistinguishable from schizophrenia that can continue for days or weeks. The
pharmacotherapeutic problem is to choose between acute doses of an antipsychotic, a
benzodiazepine, and watchful waiting, while checking for illicit drugs in urine or blood, evaluating
possible medical causes, and obtaining a recent history from friends or relatives. Benzodiazepines
should not be used with patients who appear to be already intoxicated from alcohol or sedative
drugs.
Schizophrenic, Schizophreniform, and Manic Psychoses
When the likelihood of a drug-induced psychosis is low and the patient is manifestly acutely
psychotic—paranoid, disorganized, hallucinated, agitated, belligerent, and so forth—the rapid
tranquilization strategies described earlier are quite useful. Often oral haloperidol is taken without
objection by the patient; in that case, liquid medication is preferred, since ingestion can be
ensured.
Parenteral antipsychotics (e.g., chlorpromazine 50 mg, aripiprazole 9.75 mg, olanzapine 10–30 mg,
ziprasidone 10–20 mg, haloperidol 5–10 mg) are all effective. An antiparkinsonian drug shouldPrint: Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment http://www.psychiatryonline.com/popup.aspx?aID=238762&print=yes…
7 of 11
31/01/2009 06:55
usually be given at the same time as the typical antipsychotics to help avert dystonia.
Acute mania is managed with a combination of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and mood
stabilizers. Although loading doses of lithium have not proved useful, loading doses of valproate
may speed the onset of response. Valproate at an oral loading dosage of 20 mg/kg/day has been
associated with moderate antimanic effects occurring in as little as a few days. Standard doses of
mood stabilizers may take a week or longer to achieve adequate control of mania. Benzodiazepines
may be as useful as antipsychotics in the acute management of nonpsychotic manic patients.
However, both psychotic and nonpsychotic patients benefit equally well from an atypical agent, and
these drugs are more rapidly acting than mood stabilizers in the management of acute mania. Thus,
we will typically prescribe an atypical antipsychotic agent for a manic patient and add a
benzodiazepine or mood stabilizer as necessary.
When a psychotic patient can give some history and has a preference among available
antipsychotic drugs, or when relatives or past medical records provide relevant information, the
drug reported as best for the particular patient should be used.
Patients may present to the ER with antipsychotic complications in many forms (Table 10–4). One
still fairly common form may be the development of acute EPS. The most worrisome of the acute
EPS is dystonia. As discussed in Chapter 4 (“Antipsychotic Drugs”), young males are most
vulnerable to acute dystonic reactions, which may include oculogyric crisis, opisthotonos,
torticollis, trismus, or laryngospasm. Although all dystonic reactions are very frightening to
patients, laryngospasm compromises the airway and is potentially fatal. Severe dystonic reactions
may occur at any time of treatment, but they usually occur in the first few days of neuroleptic use.
Furthermore, high-potency typical antipsychotics may have a greater association with dystonia. The
most reliable and rapid treatment for dystonia is intravenous diphenhydramine 50 mg or
benztropine 2 mg every 30 minutes until the dystonia resolves. Laryngospasm may require
intubation and the use of intravenous lorazepam to treat the spasm. If intravenous access cannot
be secured, intramuscular injections of the drugs will be necessary. Although atypical agents are
less commonly associated with dystonic reactions, such reactions still sometimes occur.
Table 10–4. Emergency complications of antipsychotic use
Complication Risk factors Clinical findings Management
Dystonia Age < 40, male,
high-potency agents
Torticollis, opisthotonos, oculogyric
crisis, trismus, laryngospasm
Diphenhydramine (iv) or
benztropine (iv); lorazepam
and maintain airway for
laryngospasm
Overdose Age < 40, male,
educated;
schizophrenic,
psychotic depression
Hypothermia/hyperthermia, EPS,
hypotension, anticholinergic toxicity,
seizures, arrhythmia
Gastric lavage, hydration,
antiparkinsonian agents for
EPS, cardiac monitoring
Neuroleptic
malignant
syndrome
Dehydration; lithium
use; high doses
Delirium, hyperthermia, severe EPS,
autonomic instability, elevated CK
and LFTs
Stop antipsychotics;
dantrolene (iv),
bromocriptine, lorazepam
(iv)
Note. CK = creatine kinase; EPS = extrapyramidal symptoms; iv = intravenous; LFT = liver function tests.
An overdose of antipsychotics is rarely fatal. However, overdoses may result in hypothermia,
hyperthermia, severe EPS, and occasional arrhythmias. Low-potency agents may additionally
produce anticholinergic toxicity and hypotension. Hypotension is a complication of risperidone
overdose as well. All antipsychotics reduce the seizure threshold, but clozapine may be particularly
problematic in overdose. Psychotically depressed patients and young, educated male schizophrenic
patients may be at greatest risk for antipsychotic overdoses. Antipsychotic overdoses usually
respond to gastric lavage and supportive measures, including hydration, antiparkinsonian drugs forPrint: Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment http://www.psychiatryonline.com/popup.aspx?aID=238762&print=yes…
8 of 11
31/01/2009 06:55
EPS, and cardiac monitoring.
NMS is a relatively rare complication of antipsychotic use that was discussed in Chapter 4. It
represents a medical emergency and is characterized by severe EPS, delirium, hyperthermia, and
autonomic abnormalities. Both typical and atypical antipsychotics, including clozapine, are
sometimes associated with NMS. The major risk factors for EPS appear to be dehydration,
concurrent use of lithium, and rapid titration to higher doses of all standard neuroleptics.
Treatment involves immediate cessation of antipsychotics, support of vital functions, and
prescription of dantrolene sodium as a muscle relaxant in doses of 0.8–1 mg/kg iv every 6 hours
for up to 2 weeks. Longer use may be associated with extreme respiratory suppression and muscle
atrophy. Bromocriptine at a dosage of up to 5 mg tid may help relieve some of the EPS, and
lorazepam 1 mg iv tid may also provide relief. In refractory cases, ECT is also reported to be of
utility.
Delirium
DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association 2000) criteria for delirium include a disturbance of
consciousness, a change in cognition, a fluctuating course, and an organic basis for the disorder.
Common causes of delirium include withdrawal syndromes, medication overdoses,
endocrinopathies, metabolic abnormalities, and infections. Very old persons appear to be at
greatest risk for the development of delirium, but it may occur at any age. The presence of delirium
is a medical emergency and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
Clinical management of delirium centers on assessment of the underlying cause and supportive
care. Physical restraints are often necessary and tend to be preferable to the administration of
psychoactive agents, which may further cloud the clinical picture. When medications are required
for control of an agitated, delirious patient, small doses of high-potency antipsychotics may be the
treatment of choice. Drugs such as haloperidol do not cause significant anticholinergic or
-adrenergic symptoms and tend not to present problems of cardiac or respiratory depression. A
typical dosage of haloperidol in the management of elderly delirious patients is 0.5 mg bid. Another
pharmacological option is the use of small doses of 3-hydroxy-benzodiazepines, such as lorazepam
and oxazepam, that have no active metabolites, have short half-lives, and are well metabolized
even in elderly patients. Lorazepam can be administered in doses of 0.5–1 mg iv every 30 minutes,
if administered slowly to avoid very high peak serum levels and subsequent respiratory depression.
Oxazepam is not available in a parenteral form and has the second disadvantage of slow absorption
and thus slower onset of action. If the patient is able to take medication orally, oxazepam 15 mg tid
as needed for agitation is worth considering but is generally less desirable than lorazepam. Another
strategy with which clinicians have had some success in the treatment of postoperative delirium
include gabapentin (Leung et al. 2006). Gabapentin has also been associated with reducing
perioperative pain and reducing the need for analgesics.
SEVERE ANXIETY
Patients can present with panic, severe fear and anxiety, or multiple somatic symptoms. The
symptoms of severe anxiety may be associated with a variety of medical conditions, including
hypothyroidism, hypoglycemia, coronary artery disease, carcinoid syndrome, and
pheochromocytoma. In addition, severe anxiety may be a feature of other psychiatric disorders,
including schizophrenia, acute drug intoxication, alcohol withdrawal, and depression.
The anxiety disorders with which patients are most likely to present in the ER are panic disorder
and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). If medical illness can be rapidly ruled out or the patient
has a known history of panic attacks, oral diazepam offers significant advantages because of its
rapid onset of action after administration. Either 5- or 10-mg doses prn can be tried, depending on
the severity of the anxiety and the patient’s past responses to sedatives. If intramuscular
administration is required, however, diazepam is not an ideal choice because of its erratic
absorption. Lorazepam and midazolam are the only benzodiazepines reliably absorbed from the
intramuscular route. Lorazepam 1 mg im repeated hourly is effective in the acute management ofPrint: Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment http://www.psychiatryonline.com/popup.aspx?aID=238762&print=yes…
9 of 11
31/01/2009 06:55
severe anxiety. Antidepressant drugs are indicated in the longer-term treatment of panic disorders,
but they are slow in onset and of no immediate value in patients experiencing acute, severe
anxiety. Thus, it may be appropriate to use a benzodiazepine with an antidepressant in the initial
weeks of antipanic therapy. A month later, the benzodiazepine may be tapered off after the
antidepressant has begun to work. Clonazepam is also an effective antipanic agent and can be
initiated at a dosage of 0.5 mg bid. Although anticonvulsants such as gabapentin and tiagabine are
occasionally useful, they do not appear to be as rapidly acting as the benzodiazepines.
PTSD patients may present to the ER with significant symptoms of autonomic arousal from
flashback experiences, intrusive thoughts, and insomnia. It is important to evaluate patients for
comorbid disorders such as depression and substance abuse. Violent or agitated PTSD patients
should be managed by the rapid tranquilization methods described earlier. -Blockers may also be
helpful in the initial management of autonomic hyperarousal. However, long-term treatments,
including the use of antidepressants and mood-stabilizing agents, are best initiated after the acute
distress is reduced and long-term follow-up is secured.
Some experts prefer low-dose antipsychotic drugs in patients with borderline or other personality
disorders who present in an acute crisis. If the patient has a past history of sedative abuse,
olanzapine 5–10 mg or chlorpromazine could be used. Chlorpromazine’s sedation is likely to persist
for many hours—at times, longer than is desired. If the patient is currently dependent on sedative
drugs, consideration must be given to the problem of withdrawal reactions if the drugs are stopped
abruptly. Buspirone is available for use in anxiety, but single doses are not helpful in reducing
acute symptoms.
STUPOR AND CATATONIA
Catatonia is a syndrome that may be induced by a variety of medical and psychiatric disorders. It is
characterized by cataplexy and waxy flexibility, mutism, resistance to instructions or attempts to
be moved (negativism), and intermittent agitation. The causes of catatonia range from metabolic
disorders such as hepatic encephalopathy and ketoacidosis to postictal states and basal ganglia
lesions. Affective disorders represent the most common psychiatric cause of catatonia, although
the syndrome often occurs in schizophrenia.
Nonpsychiatric etiologies account for a large percentage of catatonia cases. Therefore, a thorough
history, a physical examination, and laboratory assessment are required. If medical or neurological
causes for stupor can be ruled out, hospital admission to a psychiatric ward is generally indicated.
If no information on the patient is available, intravenous amobarbital sodium can sometimes
facilitate obtaining a history by letting the patient talk relatively freely. However, this approach
requires the clinician to be experienced in the technique, and, again, it is best done in an inpatient
setting (see Chapter 6: “Antianxiety Agents”). Intravenous amobarbital sodium is given at a rate
up to 50 mg/minute to a maximum of 700 mg. The dose is titrated to the size and age of the
patient; smaller and older patients require smaller amounts. There is a significant risk of
respiratory depression with larger doses, which necessitates having a crash cart available and
perhaps having a second IV line in case of difficulties. Parenteral lorazepam (1–2 mg) appears
safer than amobarbital, and it may also facilitate the patient’s ability to give a history.
There are lethal forms of catatonia in which patients present with hyperthermia, extreme rigidity,
mental status changes, muscle breakdown, rhabdomyolysis, and renal failure. This so-called lethal
or malignant catatonia may be quite difficult to distinguish from NMS. The distinction may be
important, because lethal catatonia sometimes responds to antipsychotics, whereas antipsychotics
are contraindicated in treating NMS. Fortunately, both NMS and lethal catatonia may respond to
ECT.
EMERGENCY ROOM REFERRALS
Psychiatric patients are occasionally referred to a general hospital ER by their psychiatrist after
telephone calls or office visits. Definite or possible overdose attempts, unexplained confusional
states, or serious drug side effects (such as MAOI-related hypertensive crises or acute dystonia)Print: Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment http://www.psychiatryonline.com/popup.aspx?aID=238762&print=yes…
10 of 11
31/01/2009 06:55
are reasonable examples of appropriate referrals.
It is important for psychiatrists to remember that ER physicians may know less about the
pharmacological effects of psychiatric drugs than they do, despite the natural hope that the ER
doctor will be all-knowing and highly resourceful. Therefore, to ensure that no major gaps in
knowledge exist, it is worthwhile to call the ER before the patient gets there and/or after the
patient has been initially evaluated. Many physicians have never heard that meperidine can be fatal
when added to an MAOI. Some who do not know that TCAs have quinidine-like effects on cardiac
conduction might give quinidine to treat an arrhythmia resulting from TCA overdose. Not
uncommonly in ERs, a patient with a severe headache due to a hypertensive crisis may be ignored
(i.e., made to wait) until the headache has passed on its own.
If a patient is sick enough to be admitted to a hospital and the psychiatrist knows of a history of
benzodiazepine use, the psychiatrist should encourage the hospital staff to be concerned about
withdrawal symptoms such as seizures or delirium. Also, the emergency physician may be
reassured to know that overdoses of SSRIs, serotonin2 (5-HT2) antagonists, venlafaxine, and
bupropion are likely to be relatively benign. In our experience, ER staff seem interested and
appreciative when the responsible psychiatrist calls and provides both clinical and
psychopharmacological input.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th
Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000
Andrezina R, Josiassen RC, Marcus RN, et al: Intramuscular aripiprazole for the treatment of acute
agitation in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a double-blind,
placebo-controlled comparison with intramuscular haloperidol. Psychopharmacology (Berl)
188:281–292, 2006a
Andrezina R, Marcus RN, Oren DA, et al: Intramuscular aripiprazole or haloperidol and transition to
oral therapy in patients with agitation associated with schizophrenia: subanalysis of a double-blind
study. Curr Med Res Opin 22:2209–2219, 2006b
Bazire S: MAOIs and narcotic analgesics (letter). Br J Psychiatry 151:701–710, 1987 [PubMed]
Bongar B: Suicide Guidelines for Assessment, Management and Treatment. New York, Oxford
University Press, 1992
Breier A, Wright P, Birkett M, et al: Intramuscular olanzapine: dose-related improvement in acutely
agitated patients with schizophrenia. Presentation at the 154th annual meeting of the American
Psychiatric Association, New Orleans, May 5–10, 2001
Browne B, Lintner S: Monoamine oxidase inhibitors and narcotic analgesics: a critical review of the
implications for treatment. Br J Psychiatry 151: 210–212, 1987 [PubMed]
Cole J: Drugs and seclusion and restraint. McLean Hospital Journal 10:37–53, 1985
Crome P: Antidepressant overdosage. Drugs 23:431–461, 1982 [PubMed]
Dubin WR, Field JA: Rapid tranquilization of the violent patient. Am J Emerg Med 7:313–319, 1989
[PubMed]
Dubin W, Stolberg R: Emergency Psychiatry for the House Officer. New York, SP Medical & Scientific
Books, 1981
Dubin WR, Waxman MH, Weiss KJ, et al: Rapid tranquilization: the efficacy of oral concentrate. J
Clin Psychiatry 46:475–478, 1985 [PubMed]
Fawcett J, Scheftner WA, Clark DC: Time related predictors of suicide. Am J Psychiatry
147:1189–1194, 1990 [PubMed]
Goldberg RJ, Dubin WR, Fogel BS: Behavioral emergencies: assessment and psychopharmacologicPrint: Chapter 10. Emergency Room Treatment http://www.psychiatryonline.com/popup.aspx?aID=238762&print=yes…
11 of 11
31/01/2009 06:55
management. Clin Neuropharmacol 12:233–248, 1989 [PubMed]
Hillard JR (ed): Manual of Clinical Emergency Psychiatry. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric
Press, 1990
Hughes DH: Trends and treatment models in emergency psychiatry. Hosp Community Psychiatry
44:927–928, 1993 [PubMed]
Hyman SE, Tesar GE: Manual of Psychiatric Emergencies, 3rd Edition. Boston, MA, Little, Brown,
1994
Lavoie FIV, Carter GL, Danzl DF, et al: Emergency department violence in United States teaching
hospitals. Ann Emerg Med 17:1227–1232, 1988 [PubMed]
Leung JM, Sands LP, Rico M, et al: Pilot clinical trial of gabapentin to decrease postoperative
delirium in older patients. Neurology 67:1251–1253, 2006 [PubMed]
Meehan KM, Zhang F, David SR, et al: A double-blind, randomized comparison of the efficacy and
safety of intramuscular injections of olanzapine, lorazepam, or placebo in treating acutely agitated
patients diagnosed with bipolar mania. J Clin Psychopharmacol 21:389–397, 2001 [PubMed]
Meehan KM, Wang H, David SR, et al: Comparison of rapidly acting intramuscular olanzapine,
lorazepam, and placebo: a double-blind, randomized study in acutely agitated patients with
dementia. Neuropsychopharmacology 26:494–504, 2002 [PubMed]
Moller HJ, Kissling W, Lang C, et al: Efficacy and side effects of haloperidol in psychotic patients:
oral vs. intravenous administration. Am J Psychiatry 139:1571–1575, 1982 [PubMed]
Montgomery SA: Venlafaxine: a new dimension in antidepressant pharmacotherapy. J Clin
Psychiatry 54:119–124, 1993
Munizza C, Furlan PM, d’Elia A, et al: Emergency psychiatry: a review of the literature. Acta
Psychiatr Scand Suppl 374:1–51, 1993 [PubMed]
Puryear DA: Proposed standards in emergency psychiatry. Hosp Community Psychiatry 43:14–15,
1992 [PubMed]
Rubino A, Roskell N, Tennis P, et al: Risk of suicide during treatment with venlafaxine, citalopram,
fluoxetine, and dothiepin: retrospective cohort study. BMJ December 12, 2006 [Epub ahead of
print]
Saklad SR, Ereshefsky L, Jann MW, et al: Usefulness of injectable and oral lorazepam in psychotic
and developmentally disabled patients. Paper presented at the 138th annual meeting of the
American Psychiatric Association, Dallas, TX, May 20–23, 1985
Szuster RR, Schanbacher BL, McCann SC, et al: Underdiagnosis of psychoactive-substance-induced
organic mental disorders in emergency psychiatry. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 16:319–327, 1990
[PubMed]
Weissberg MP: Emergency psychiatry: a critical educational omission (editorial). Ann Intern Med
114:246–247, 1991 [PubMed]
Wright P, Lindberg SR, Birkett M, et al: Intramuscular olanzapine and intramuscular haloperidol in
acute schizophrenia: antipsychotic efficacy and extrapyramidal safety during the first 24 hours of
treatment. Can J Psychiatry 48:716–721, 2003 [PubMed]
Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Course Content
Introduction to Emergency Medicine
-
Overview of Emergency Medicine
-
The Emergency Room Team
-
Patient Triage and Assessment
-
Introduction to Emergency Medicine Quiz
-
Common Emergencies and Their Initial Management
Triage and Rapid Assessment Techniques
Critical Care and Life-Saving Interventions
Advanced Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies
Reflective Practice and Continuous Improvement in the ER
Earn a certificate
Add this certificate to your resume to demonstrate your skills & increase your chances of getting noticed.